President Bush Tribute

	Duration: 04:27 minutes Upload Time: 06-07-10 21:13:16 User: manoffiji :::: Favorites
Description: A montage since Sept. 11, 2001.
Comments
buddy34 ::: Favorites WASHINGTON, August 4, 2007 — The House gave final approval Saturday to changes in a terrorism surveillance program which broadens the scope of the executive branch's eavesdropping power. In the final vote, 41 Democrats joined all but 2 Republicans in backing the measure. 07-08-07 16:09:24 _____________________________________________________
buddy34 ::: Favorites President Bush signed legislation August 3, 2007, that intensifies the anti-terrorism effort at home, shifting money to high-risk states & cities & expanding scrutiny of air & sea cargo. "This legislation builds upon the considerable progress we have made in strengthening our defenses and protecting Americans since the attacks of Sept. 11," President Bush said. He also said Congress should target grant dollars to cities & states based on their vulnerability to a terrorist attack. 07-08-05 07:39:02 _____________________________________________________
buddy34 ::: Favorites "The merger between al-Qaida and its Iraqi affiliate is an alliance of killers and that is why the finest military in the world is on their trail," President Bush said. Al-Qaida, led by bin Laden, orchestrated the terrorist strikes on the U.S. by turning hijacked airplanes into killing machines. The terror group al-Qaida is seizing upon its affiliate, al-Qaida in Iraq, to recruit members & organize attacks. 07-07-27 15:54:01 _____________________________________________________
diesel5355 ::: Favorites Thats a failry large proposal. Why not take an easier step to then continue his 'profit'? 07-07-19 10:11:15 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites "I think it's clear that in March, when the invasion took place, the evidence that had been brought forward was rapidly falling apart," Hans Blix, who oversaw the agency's investigation into whether Iraq had chemical and biological weapons, said on CNN's "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer." 07-07-20 16:18:25 _____________________________________________________
diesel5355 ::: Favorites (i have no idea what a uni is) THE terrorists are the ones destroying the electrical towers and hospitals. We did not destroy hospitals, we build them. The US ARMY is building them. we do not destroy there water source, terrorist insurgents do. and the nation was wealthy BUT THE WEALTH WAS NOT SPREAD TO THE PEOPLE. now it is. 07-07-19 09:50:59 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites The problem withthe water and electricty supplies is that you bombed the orginal sources and all the work done so far has never lasted due to both jobs this was said in the latest report in iraq they also say that the standard of living in iraq is fallin and this report was commisined by bush. 07-07-20 16:40:51 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites all of what i said is on the web the bit on utah was fom a a news paper that was reporting on the congress debate wheter or not to drill there the same with alaska it was a congress report estimateing th damage that would be incured by the drilling.now i'm irish but i'm pretty sure that american congress ain't propaganda 07-07-19 09:26:41 _____________________________________________________
bluejellyman ::: Favorites actually, it is. The Congress majority is now liberal, after the 2006 Congressional elections. Yes, you'll probably call me a fool for thinking anything liberal is propaganda, but that's the way it is. I respect the environment, but not using its resources is just, well, to be frank, stupid. We should take care of the earth, but not worship it. 07-07-19 12:54:13 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites end ohh and that congress report was written by a republican and with a republican majorty in congress so realy you jst sajid that republicans are spewing propaganda well done glad to see you'r finally see the truth 07-07-20 16:08:30 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites U.S inspectors were never sent nor did bush ask for them to be.nowing that under nato law he could'nt he got other countrys in nato and the U.N to go and like any leader he was annoyed but did let them inspect they said there was'nt any wmd but did bush belive them no he just wanted war inspectors from 26 countrys looked and could'nt find any proof so who is to belame for the U.S body bags you'r president 07-07-19 09:21:50 _____________________________________________________
diesel5355 ::: Favorites WE HAVE asked saddam do disarm. He agreed but never did such a thing. the UN sent inspectors. Then the UN concluded that he had chemical and biological weapons. Do some reasearch and see what happened because your totally wrong. And use some punctuation marks for gods sake. I can barely read. 07-07-19 09:58:44 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites thats what the head of the u.n inspectors said after inspecting the iraqi labs so hmmi think you'r the one hows got it wrong look it up they did'nt have any wmds they even let the media into 1 lab and even the reporter from fox news said that the place had been inactive for years 07-07-20 16:18:19 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites this would be true if you fight in the U.S army only because they are incapable of helping look at the areas in which the brits control in the south when they arrived things for them were as bad for them as it was for you.They tried you'r style of blowing up anything that moved and found it did'nt work.they then tried a model of peace keeping used by the irish and with in 6 months the brits were patrolling without having to wear helments or body armour because there was no danger to them. 07-07-20 16:41:36 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites iraq had nothing to with 9/11 that was binladen not saddam.saddam and bin laden were enemys and actvley attacked each other so if you want to take"revenage" you should be in afganistan noth iraq 07-07-19 09:18:15 _____________________________________________________
diesel5355 ::: Favorites We are in afghanistan. We are in iraq to have a "portal" to fight through. 07-07-19 09:51:56 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites you have half the numbers in afganistan then you do in iraq the people who attacked at 9/11 are based in afganistan but you chosse not to chase them but decide to attack another country for no reason and what do you mean by We are in iraq to have a "portal" to fight through. 07-07-20 16:23:23 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites question do you think that the people fighting you are hell bent on causing problems???? 07-07-20 16:41:45 _____________________________________________________
bluejellyman ::: Favorites Look, we are in Afghanistan as well. We're trying as hard as we can to go after the terrorists, and so far, the Bush Administration, while it could be doing better, is still doing an awesome job. I don't care what the hell you say because I know who is right and who is wrong. I'm sick of this, and I'm done. I will no longer reply. 07-07-20 21:04:02 _____________________________________________________
cscian ::: Favorites 1/2 a million dead is awsome you realy are bent you now that and you'r hardly in afganistan you have 5 times as many troops in iraq then you have where the threat to america is real afganistan 07-07-21 17:31:44 _____________________________________________________